Hola,

escribo para señalar un inconveniente que he notado al usar Gamma para generar presentaciones. Antes, el programa respetaba bastante bien las palabras del texto original, adaptándolas sutilmente (por ejemplo, llevando el contenido a tercera persona) pero manteniendo la esencia y el estilo del guion que yo proporcionaba.

Últimamente, sin embargo, al realizar los resúmenes de cada diapositiva, Gamma cambia demasiado las palabras originales e incluso introduce ideas que no son del todo fieles al texto. Esto me genera un problema concreto: yo trabajo con una voz artificial que narra el mismo guion que subo a Gamma, por lo que necesito que el contenido de las diapositivas coincida casi palabra por palabra con el texto original cuando se reaiza el resumen o distribucion del texto. De lo contrario, tengo que rehacer el trabajo para que todo cuadre, lo cual me hace perder el doble de tiempo, cuando la idea justamente es optimizar el proceso.

Por favor, les pido que revisen este punto y consideren una mejora: que Gamma mantenga más fielmente las palabras del texto original, y que cualquier complemento que agregue esté totalmente en sintonía con el contenido de base.

Gracias de antemano por su atención.

While I appreciate Gamma.app's efforts to enhance my projects with AI, I have an education AI that works extremely well for me and the lesson plans generated by Claude are sufficient. Sadly though, when I copy/paste Claude's work into Gamma at the design phase, in transmission, Gamma often changes or truncates what Claude has created for me. It's deeply, deeply annoying. It took me a while to realize that things were missing or changed and by then, I'd taught the lesson, but not as I'd intended. I REALLY, REALLY, REALLY want Gamma to respect what I paste in and stop changing the work so drastically. I get that if I choose "medium" for slide content, I can expect a bit of content to disappear. However, that doesn't quite account for Gamma literally changing the content that appears AND putting the content in a bizarre order in the presentation. And no, adding slides doesn't actually fix this issue. Yes, I am well aware that I am essentially complaining about hours of work done FOR me, but I still put in HOURS to make my classes make sense for my students, so please help me get some of my life back by balancing Gamma's unique capabilities with the "sense" to recognize another AI's input. [I would imagine that Monsha, Diffit, or Brisk users have similar complaints.] Feel free to ask follow-up questions if this post needs clarification.

I wrote all of my slides, copied the text in, only to see that Gamma chose some of the text and not others. Is there a "fit all text" or "no editing" qualifier that can be deployed to ensure at least my text made it into the deck and so I don't have to double check and basically revise the entire layout to fit my required text?

All the bullets in my slide are coming off as a single list, vs nested lists.

This is the case for both Slides and PPTs.

Help!! I have a TON of slides to import.

See attached example.

sometimes i do not wish for almost any text to be changed - just design. it would be helpful to have a way to mark specific text that needs to be used as is (such as quotes, or specific important infomration)

this is especially important when i'm using Gamma after already created a very percise text - or slides content description.

J'ai réalisé un document Word contenant du contenu textuel à Gamma, afin de générer des slides à partir de ce contenu. Résultat très insatisfaisant : la grande majorité du contenu a été omise, et Gamma ne m'a proposé que 5 slides là où il en aurait fallu une trentaine. De plus les slides elles-mêmes comportent des omissions majeures par rapport à mes phrases.

Include more details in the created Gammas, such as the settings used, the selected theme, and whether the text content was auto-generated or preserved from the input document. Also, specify the AI image model and image style source. These details will make it easier to compare multiple versions (e.g., after trying 3–4 options) and quickly identify the settings that work best.